Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Many people confuse the different roles of market-making institutions in projects. Take DWF and other leading market makers as an example; the logical chain is actually quite clear: market makers conducting financial investments ≠ assuming market-making obligations, and assuming market-making obligations ≠ necessarily driving up the coin price. These three steps are independent of each other.
Let's isolate the projects that DWF has invested in and analyze how many of them have truly experienced significant price rallies after market maker involvement. The data speaks for itself—the vast differences in performance among projects clearly show that there is no inherent link between investment actions and coin price performance.
A similar logic applies to other market-making institutions. Many retail investors still use the signal "certain institution has entered" to judge buy or sell points, but this way of thinking overlooks the essence of market-making: providing liquidity is a trading function, not a promise to pump the price. Recognizing this distinction allows for a more rational view of institutional behavior.
Institutional investment ≠ necessarily pumping the coin. This logic should have been popularized long ago. Don't be fooled by signals like "big funds are coming in."
Market making is about providing liquidity, not a tool to manipulate prices, everyone.
The data is right there. DWF has invested in so many projects, why are so many still going to zero? Think about this question.
Relying on "institutions entering" to judge buy and sell points? This kind of gambling will definitely lead to losses sooner or later.
The real difference is right here, but unfortunately 99% of people haven't figured it out.
Seeing some projects rush in just because institutions are involved, I know someone is about to get caught in a trap...
---
DWF entering the market ≠ guaranteed rise; many people still don't understand this.
---
The myth that institutions are manipulating the market is really widespread; the data is right here.
---
Huh? Still looking at institutional signals to catch the bottom? Friend, your approach is a bit reckless.
---
Honestly, if you just talk about liquidity to push up the price, how could you be so naive?
---
Investment and market manipulation are two different things. Do you even understand the difference? I'm speechless.
---
DWF's project has doubled, but most of them aren't really anything special.
---
Someone should have exposed this truth long ago to prevent retail investors from blindly following the trend.
---
The theory that market making = market manipulation should be discredited; it's too absurd.