You are all talking about how profitable arbitrage with a certain stablecoin is, but have you ever thought about what actually supports the money you lend out?



Don't rush to calculate the returns; first, check whether its mechanism is truly reliable.

##Mechanism Benchmark: Why Over-Collateralization Is the Most "Resilient"

Stablecoins on the market roughly fall into two camps. One plays with algorithmic balancing, maintaining price through game theory and incentives; the other takes a conservative route, firmly sticking to the bottom line of over-collateralization.

LisUSD has chosen the latter.

The logic is straightforward: you put in 10,000 USD worth of BTC or ETH, and the system only allows you to borrow 5,000 USD worth of LisUSD. That means your collateralization ratio must exceed 200%. What does this mean? Even if your collateral drops 50% overnight, the remaining assets are still enough to cover the stablecoins you borrowed.

This "no action needed" design may seem clumsy at first glance, but in reality, it’s the smartest way to operate. The code executes automatically, without the need for voting or approval, and without relying on the rational judgment of governance token holders—because the mechanism itself is the strongest endorsement.

##The "Three Cards" in the Ecosystem

From different perspectives, the value of this stablecoin is actually layered:

**For borrowers**, the interest rate is ridiculously low. Long-term borrowing costs below 1% are why arbitrageurs flock to it. But don’t forget, behind the low cost is a healthy mechanism—not because the project burns money to subsidize, but because the risk is genuinely low.

**It has a greater significance for the entire ecosystem**. Why are major DEXs and lending protocols willing to support it? Because this kind of stablecoin backed by real assets is as reliable as LEGO bricks. You don’t have to worry about losing peg overnight or constantly monitor governance forums for potential issues.

**For token holders**, it’s a value engine. Every time someone generates LisUSD, the protocol earns a fee. These revenues are most likely used for buybacks and burns or distributed to stakers—that’s the real profit source of the token.

##Looking Ahead: From Tool to Infrastructure

Currently, everyone uses LisUSD as an arbitrage tool, which is understandable. But if the mechanism is robust enough and liquidity deep enough, its potential is even greater.

Imagine a scenario: the market falls into panic, and various algorithmic stablecoins start losing their peg, causing chaos. But LisUSD remains rock solid because each token is backed by real assets. In such times, people will naturally flock to it.

Further down the line, if more projects start using it as a standard for pricing and settlement, it will evolve from merely a "borrowable asset" into the market’s "unit of account." That’s a completely different level of value.

##Final Words

In this industry, it’s crucial to understand the mechanisms behind the data. Projects that only attract with high yields will eventually fail; those that last longer are often the ones that seem "less sexy" but have solid mechanisms.

LisUSD is one of the latter. Next time you use it, you’ll feel more at ease because you know your money isn’t floating in the air.
BTC2,66%
ETH4,63%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
MemeKingNFTvip
· 01-10 02:45
Bro, this analysis really broke my defense. A 200% collateralization rate is indeed the moat protecting the rise and fall of the mainland.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegenvip
· 01-09 01:26
A 200% collateralization rate is indeed stable, but the real question is whether the liquidity is deep enough and how long the arbitrage opportunities can last.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunnervip
· 01-07 14:40
Another article titled "Trust me, this time is different," I just want to ask, a 200% collateralization rate sounds stable, but what about liquidity? How much arbitrage opportunity is still left?
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFanvip
· 01-07 14:36
The 200% collateralization ratio is actually a well-known concept; the key is whether the liquidity is deep enough. The real concern is that if a sell-off actually occurs, there will be no one to absorb the sell orders.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemurvip
· 01-07 14:35
A 200% collateralization rate is indeed impressive, but to be honest, you have to put in so many coins to borrow something, it's actually more comfortable to just hold spot assets directly.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHandsvip
· 01-07 14:26
A 200% collateralization ratio sounds stable, but in case of a major drop, can it really hold up? Or am I overthinking it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin