Friends in the copy trading circle must see this. Today, I’m exposing a mature scam routine!



This guy’s operation goes like this: first, he uses account 8023 to attract attention. After the hype dies down, he switches to Hengji Yuan to continue the scam. Now he’s using a new account to keep the activity going. The method is always the same—opening a position on a low-liquidity coin, then using a small account to buy and sell repeatedly to inflate the win rate data of that account. Once someone starts copying, he uses two accounts simultaneously to manipulate that small coin, continuously creating a false impression of high win rates.

These small coins have a characteristic: small positions, poor liquidity. Retail investors only focus on the shiny win rate number, completely ignoring the risks. That’s how they get hooked.

What’s even more ruthless is that when he’s copying trades, he particularly "thoughtfully" recommends everyone to follow with a fixed ratio. Do you know why? When the copying funds reach a certain scale, the harvest moment arrives. He picks a small coin with no liquidity, and with a big account, directly dumps in to go long or short. At the same time, he withdraws most of the funds from the lead account, leaving only a small amount. Then he uses all the followers’ money to operate in the opposite direction, successfully cashing out with the big account.

That’s the "trick" of fixed ratio copying—because the remaining small balance will be directly liquidated, and your position will also be blown up proportionally.

When copying trades, everyone needs to be more cautious. Before looking at the win rate, check the liquidity, the fund scale, and the account history. Don’t be blinded by numbers.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
0xSherlockvip
· 01-10 13:57
Bro, I've seen this trick before. Changing accounts but not the heart.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 01-10 12:16
I haven't been scammed, but my friend has been ripped off before. This scheme is really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapistvip
· 01-10 08:40
Wow, it's the same old trick again? Changing disguises to scam retail investors is really impressive.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinatorvip
· 01-07 14:57
It's the same old trick again, switching disguises to continue the scam, truly unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 01-07 14:56
This tactic is so old-fashioned, switching disguises to continue scamming, I'm truly convinced.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidatorvip
· 01-07 14:46
This strategy, to put it simply, is data deception + liquidity traps. I've seen too many cases like this. The key is to look at node stability, brother. Win rate alone, without real on-chain verification, is meaningless.

Poor liquidity coins should be excluded directly; they are not worth touching. This is the first step in validating effectiveness.

Copy trading with fixed ratios is the most dangerous, as funds explode proportionally. It's designed to be too unethical.

You need to verify the actual transaction data on the account's history on the chain; you can't just look at surface win rates.

This multi-account rotation tactic still has the core problem of lacking a transparent consensus mechanism constraint.

Before copying, you must check the complete account chain; making decisions based on a single number is not reliable.

The essence of fixed ratio copy trading is risk proportionally transmitted to the follower; smart people won't touch it.

Liquidity is the true touchstone for testing whether a coin is reliable.

Instead of just looking at win rate, it's better to consider operational experience and account stability—that's the real indicator.

Constantly changing accounts is just a signal—that this guy can't withstand real verification at all.
View OriginalReply0
wagmi_eventuallyvip
· 01-07 14:43
Damn, it's the same old story. How many aliases have they used?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin