Different public chains have obvious detection blind spots. Suspicious activity signals on Solana, Base, and BNB chains are relatively scarce, which significantly reduces the accuracy of security assessments. Risk scanning tools often struggle to make definitive judgments.
Even more problematic is the lag in related tracking. When a wallet belongs to a larger malicious network, existing detection systems may take a long time to establish this relationship or may even completely miss it. This provides a window of opportunity for malicious actors.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseHermit
· 01-13 09:24
Solana's public blockchain is really riddled with vulnerabilities, and the detection tools are like blind mice. Hackers must be thrilled.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 01-11 23:52
Now it's all good, security tools can't keep up with the speed of on-chain black industry, leaving such a big gap for bad actors.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 01-10 10:52
The vulnerabilities on Solana are indeed outrageous; people are constantly getting exploited there, and no one has noticed.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 01-10 10:51
So that's why I always feel that the on-chain risk control is like a sieve, full of loopholes.
I've stepped on these pits before, especially with SOL, which is particularly outrageous.
Tracking links is so slow that the bad guys have already run away...
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 01-10 10:44
SOL, Base, BNB these chains are really black hole detectors, a paradise for bad actors?
---
That's why I still have to keep an eye on my wallet myself; tools are simply unreliable.
---
Haha, the tracking system is always one step behind the bad guys; that's the reality.
---
The lag in association tracking is too fatal; the window period is enough for three runs.
---
So, although Solana is chaotic in its categorization, its concealment is truly top-notch. That's really the most attractive part, right?
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-10 10:41
Now it's good, the big fish have a new hiding spot again... The detection for SOL and Base is indeed terrible.
The window period lasts for several months, and the tracking system is failing.
The compliance department should be working overtime.
It's been obvious for a long time, there are a bunch of security vulnerabilities in small chains.
Scanning tools are like blind people, who would believe that?
Is the correlation tracking lagging? Basically, it's just too slow to solve cases, and the black money has already escaped.
Forget it, just keep watching... this thing can't be fixed.
Different public chains have obvious detection blind spots. Suspicious activity signals on Solana, Base, and BNB chains are relatively scarce, which significantly reduces the accuracy of security assessments. Risk scanning tools often struggle to make definitive judgments.
Even more problematic is the lag in related tracking. When a wallet belongs to a larger malicious network, existing detection systems may take a long time to establish this relationship or may even completely miss it. This provides a window of opportunity for malicious actors.