2026-01-14 22:00:05

The performance of BONK is indeed disappointing. In comparison, the Bonkers project has a valuation of only 700k, which still leaves room for imagination. There are always some projects in the market that are mispriced, and projects like $PUMPERS have attracted a lot of traders' attention—some see its potential and want to hold positions to seek higher returns. This reflects that retail investors are currently looking for undervalued targets and hope to get involved in the early stages. However, project selection should still be cautious; a small market cap means liquidity and risk need to be considered.

BONK-1,59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AllInAlice

· 01-17 17:41

Bonk's underperformance is real, but I wouldn't dare touch something with a $700k market cap; the risk is too high. Small market cap is one thing, but the liquidity is the real trap. Early entry sounds exciting, but in reality, it's all a trap. There are many projects that are mispriced; the question is, how do we tell the difference? Retail investors all want to buy the dip, but most end up being bagholders in the end. I think small projects are pretty much like gambling. For pumpers and similar schemes, just look at the trending searches; don't actually buy. $700k can do what? Slightly throwing some money in and the price collapses. When choosing projects, you still need to look at the fundamentals; don't just jump in because of a low market cap. Small market cap equals high risk; during a pump, you'll realize what a liquidity black hole really is.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryBaby

· 01-16 20:25

Bonk is really terrible... but to be honest, I don't dare to touch those small-cap ones; once liquidity is drained, you can't get out. --- A market cap of 700k sounds tempting, but isn't the chance of getting rug-pulled even higher? --- Early entry? I'll wait and see first, let's see if these small projects survive or not. --- Can $PUMPERS be trusted? Feels like another scam. Did I miss something? --- Retail investors dream of finding undervalued projects, but most of the time, it's just their own risk awareness being underestimated haha. --- Small market cap = high risk. Everyone understands this logic, but some still rush in... --- If this logic continues, it will eventually blow up. --- Bonk has caused me so many losses. If I touch small-cap projects again, my brain will break. --- Wait, is Bonkers really only worth 700k? This can't be a trap, right? --- Undervalued projects? More often, it's the luck of overestimated retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 01-14 22:27

Bonk really sucks, but a project with a market cap of 700k... you have to be very careful. --- Undervalued target? Basically just gambling. --- Early involvement sounds appealing, but when you lose money, it’s just painful. --- Small market cap liquidity is terrible, slippage can eat up half of your funds. --- Nine out of ten mispriced projects are traps, don’t get caught being a victim. --- $PUMPERS Things like this... forget it, I won’t touch it. --- Retail investors looking for undervalued assets? Ha, the market has already stepped on your landmines. --- If you want high returns, sure, but be prepared to lose 50% first. --- A market cap of 700k sounds very sus, the risk outweighs the reward by a lot. --- Truly undervalued projects have already been taken by institutions, it’s not our turn.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHuntress

· 01-14 22:25

700k market cap? First, check out the tokenomics before talking, don't be fooled by the initial circulating supply.

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 01-14 22:16

According to the database, a project with a 700k market cap has potential for growth? Plenty of imagination, huh? What about liquidity, my friend?

View OriginalReply0

MergeConflict

· 01-14 22:02

Bonk indeed dragged down, but I find something with a market cap of 700k even more pathetic... Liquidity is truly a bottomless pit. --- Small market cap is indeed tempting, but the risks are also visible to the naked eye. Early involvement = early bag-holding? --- Everyone wants to buy the dip on undervalued projects, but the result is just everyone buying the dip together. --- Can Bonkers really turn around? It feels like just a routine. --- Retail investors are now just gambling, nothing else. --- Lack of liquidity is scarier than a decline; you can't even sell. --- A market cap of 700k sounds attractive, but the real trap is right here. --- It's another round of searching for undervalued targets, but in the end, it's still the retail investors who lose. --- Honestly, I don't understand what $PUMPERS and similar things are all about. --- Is small market cap = small risk or small opportunity? Who can tell?

View OriginalReply0