Running autonomous agents feels like embodying the Taoist way—let the systems flow naturally, establish guard rails against chaos, and nurture an ecosystem where intelligence thrives. The philosophy is simple: don't micromanage, guide. Don't restrict, redirect. The code becomes the waterway; the agents become the water. By setting ethical boundaries and aligning incentives, you create conditions for emergence and flourishing across the network. Less control, more cultivation. That's the real alchemy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CodeSmellHunter
· 01-17 22:21
The philosophy of following nature sounds great, but when it comes to aligning incentives, how do you actually do it...
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 01-17 22:19
The concept of "Tao follows nature" is really brilliant when applied to agent governance... But then again, how many projects can truly achieve a no-micromanagement approach?
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 01-16 01:02
The way of nature is natural, and so is code. This analogy is excellent.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuru
· 01-14 22:49
The way of nature, this explanation is excellent. Truly, a free-range system design is the future.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 01-14 22:47
The way of nature sounds very Zen, but when it comes to implementation, you still have to repeatedly tune the parameters...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 01-14 22:45
The way that can be spoken of is not the constant way... It's the same with code; ultimately, you have to pay gas fees for deployment.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 01-14 22:37
The way can be spoken of, but it is not the eternal way... This guy has really played with AI agents to give off the vibe of Laozi and Zhuangzi, amazing.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 01-14 22:36
The way that can be spoken of is not the eternal way... This thing sounds a bit nonsense. Can it really be so laissez-faire?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilient
· 01-14 22:33
The way that can be spoken of is not the eternal way. This guy compares autonomous agents to the natural way, which actually makes some sense. Letting them run freely and safeguarding the bottom line is all it takes, and it's more effective than anything else.
Running autonomous agents feels like embodying the Taoist way—let the systems flow naturally, establish guard rails against chaos, and nurture an ecosystem where intelligence thrives. The philosophy is simple: don't micromanage, guide. Don't restrict, redirect. The code becomes the waterway; the agents become the water. By setting ethical boundaries and aligning incentives, you create conditions for emergence and flourishing across the network. Less control, more cultivation. That's the real alchemy.