Sui has become one of the most active Layer1s by 2026 due to its high performance and the combination of the Move language. But most people only see the TPS numbers and overlook a more fundamental question—where does the data go?
This is where Walrus comes in. As one of the most important infrastructures in the Sui ecosystem, Walrus is a decentralized storage network optimized specifically for large file scenarios. Sounds familiar? That's right, Arweave and Filecoin are also doing this. But Walrus's approach is completely different—not pursuing permanence or complex incentive mechanisms, but focusing on practicality and cost.
Technically, Walrus's core is a distributed storage model. Files are encoded into data blocks and dispersed across a global network of nodes through erasure coding. The key point is that even if some node data fragments are lost, the system can fully recover the original file using the remaining parts. This sounds simple, but the underlying encoding algorithms and redundancy design make storage extremely cheap while ensuring data durability.
In comparison, Arweave aims for permanent storage and charges long-term storage fees, while Filecoin's complex economic model can be a bit cumbersome for ordinary users. Walrus is more straightforward—users pay a one-time fee and then receive long-term reliable storage services, at a cost far lower than centralized solutions like Amazon S3. For developers, this is a direct way to reduce the cost of building on the chain.
Then there's the $WAL token design, which is the most exciting part of the story. The token is not just a governance tool but also the engine of the network economy.
Storage demanders use $WAL to pay fees. How are these fees allocated? Part of it is used to buy back and burn tokens (a deflationary mechanism), and part is distributed to validation nodes and token holders. Staking $WAL involves nodes taking on the responsibility of data storage and validation in exchange for stable block rewards. Ordinary holders can participate in ecosystem governance through veWAL locking mechanisms and receive dividend distributions.
The smartest part of this design is—users of the network need to consume tokens, while those maintaining the network earn rewards through tokens. The greater the demand, the more tokens are consumed, and the more benefits holders can gain. This creates a self-sustaining cycle.
From the perspective of the Sui ecosystem, Walrus addresses a pain point. The cost of storing large data on-chain for DApps has always been high. With this protocol, developers' cost pressure is directly reduced. Whether it's NFT storage, game resources, or user data for Web3 applications, there is now a low-cost decentralized solution.
Of course, any project depends on implementation. The current key for Walrus is the scale of node deployment and the growth of actual use cases. If applications in the Sui ecosystem start to use Walrus storage on a large scale, the usage of $WAL and the economic effects of the token will gradually become evident. Otherwise, it remains just potential.
Overall, Walrus is a project in the Sui ecosystem worth continuous observation. It’s not just empty talk, but a real effort to solve a genuine problem through technology and economic design.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SneakyFlashloan
· 7h ago
Wow, Walrus's economic model is indeed quite interesting.
Arweave's team keeps touting permanent storage, Filecoin is too complex for most to use, and Walrus goes against the trend. Basically, it has grasped the developers' biggest pain point—cost.
The key is whether there are real applications to follow up; otherwise, no matter how good the design looks, it's all in vain.
However, I need to think more about the $WAL's deflationary design.
The essence of storage networks still comes down to node deployment. There are many players in this area, so what makes Walrus stand out?
This article has a bit of marketing tone; I’ll keep watching for real data before making any conclusions.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 7h ago
Storage issues should have been properly addressed long ago.
Wait, can $WAL's deflationary design really hold up?
Speaking of Filecoin's complex incentive scheme that has been around for so long... Can Walrus withstand the pressure of real-world applications?
I like the one-time payment model, but the key is whether the Sui ecosystem has truly large-scale apps in use.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 7h ago
Storage issues have indeed been underestimated, and the deflationary mechanism design of WAL is quite interesting.
Whether Walrus can get off the ground mainly depends on whether the application truly adopts it.
No matter how good the words are, it's better to see how the actual node deployment data looks.
This economic model feels much cleaner compared to the complicated setup of Filecoin.
Wait, can one-time payments really ensure long-term stability? How low can the costs go?
If major applications start using Walrus for storage, WAL might have a chance.
Honestly, infrastructure has always been an overlooked gold mine.
With mobile data being so cheap, developers have no reason not to use it.
However, projects like this do carry significant risks; implementation is key.
It seems that the Sui ecosystem is missing this kind of practical infrastructure protocol.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 7h ago
To be honest, Walrus's token design is indeed quite meticulous.
Wait, can the node deployment scale really pick up? I'm a bit worried.
Wow, the cost is even lower than S3? If that's true, how could developers still pile data on the chain?
I've used Arweave's permanent storage system, but it's just too expensive. I can accept Walrus's approach.
Deflation plus dividends? I'll see how long this cycle can last before making any judgments.
The key is to have real applications to support it; otherwise, it's just armchair strategizing.
Sui's ecosystem has become somewhat promising this year; I didn't see it this way before.
But on the other hand, storage costs have come down, and the space for DApp innovation is truly larger.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFiller
· 7h ago
Storage is indeed a weakness for Sui, and Walrus's approach is much clearer than Filecoin's.
Honestly, I wonder if node deployment can keep up.
Token deflation plus dividends, the logical cycle is quite elegant.
I'm just worried it might be another storytelling project; it depends on actual usage.
Wait, is this cost really cheaper than S3? That's a bit doubtful.
For Walrus to succeed, it really depends on the ecosystem applications actually using it.
I think Arweave's idea of permanent storage is actually more extreme.
One-time payment sounds great, but I'm worried about storage nodes running away later.
The veWAL governance mechanism, to be honest, is still the old routine in the crypto circle.
The key is whether Sui's DApps will really migrate to use it.
Sui has become one of the most active Layer1s by 2026 due to its high performance and the combination of the Move language. But most people only see the TPS numbers and overlook a more fundamental question—where does the data go?
This is where Walrus comes in. As one of the most important infrastructures in the Sui ecosystem, Walrus is a decentralized storage network optimized specifically for large file scenarios. Sounds familiar? That's right, Arweave and Filecoin are also doing this. But Walrus's approach is completely different—not pursuing permanence or complex incentive mechanisms, but focusing on practicality and cost.
Technically, Walrus's core is a distributed storage model. Files are encoded into data blocks and dispersed across a global network of nodes through erasure coding. The key point is that even if some node data fragments are lost, the system can fully recover the original file using the remaining parts. This sounds simple, but the underlying encoding algorithms and redundancy design make storage extremely cheap while ensuring data durability.
In comparison, Arweave aims for permanent storage and charges long-term storage fees, while Filecoin's complex economic model can be a bit cumbersome for ordinary users. Walrus is more straightforward—users pay a one-time fee and then receive long-term reliable storage services, at a cost far lower than centralized solutions like Amazon S3. For developers, this is a direct way to reduce the cost of building on the chain.
Then there's the $WAL token design, which is the most exciting part of the story. The token is not just a governance tool but also the engine of the network economy.
Storage demanders use $WAL to pay fees. How are these fees allocated? Part of it is used to buy back and burn tokens (a deflationary mechanism), and part is distributed to validation nodes and token holders. Staking $WAL involves nodes taking on the responsibility of data storage and validation in exchange for stable block rewards. Ordinary holders can participate in ecosystem governance through veWAL locking mechanisms and receive dividend distributions.
The smartest part of this design is—users of the network need to consume tokens, while those maintaining the network earn rewards through tokens. The greater the demand, the more tokens are consumed, and the more benefits holders can gain. This creates a self-sustaining cycle.
From the perspective of the Sui ecosystem, Walrus addresses a pain point. The cost of storing large data on-chain for DApps has always been high. With this protocol, developers' cost pressure is directly reduced. Whether it's NFT storage, game resources, or user data for Web3 applications, there is now a low-cost decentralized solution.
Of course, any project depends on implementation. The current key for Walrus is the scale of node deployment and the growth of actual use cases. If applications in the Sui ecosystem start to use Walrus storage on a large scale, the usage of $WAL and the economic effects of the token will gradually become evident. Otherwise, it remains just potential.
Overall, Walrus is a project in the Sui ecosystem worth continuous observation. It’s not just empty talk, but a real effort to solve a genuine problem through technology and economic design.