Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, the official Solana account posted a very pointed comment, directly accusing the Ethereum ecosystem's L2 project Starknet of having issues with digital inflation. According to Solana, Starknet has only 8 daily active users and just 10 daily transactions, yet its market cap is an astonishing $1 billion, with FDV approaching $15 billion.
This statement caused Starknet's behind-the-scenes company StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson to become unsettled. His response was quite firm—directly mocking Solana for having 8 marketing interns (and specifically emphasizing that they are all bald), who are busy tweeting 10 times a day. The implication is that their numbers may not be entirely accurate and are just well-packaged marketing.
Interestingly, Solana co-founder Toly also chimed in, but with a more moderate attitude. He defused the tense exchange with a joke: "This is an unnecessary violent conflict between bald CEOs." While it seems like a tease on the surface, it also reflects industry frustration with such mutual accusations.
Notably, according to data from Dune, Starknet's actual daily transaction count reaches 245,416, with 2,369 active daily trading addresses. This is a huge discrepancy from the numbers initially announced by Solana, adding more complexity to the controversy. Is it due to different data sampling methods or variations in statistical standards? The industry is still discussing this.