2026-01-14 22:30:22

#美国消费者物价指数发布在即 The chairman of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, Tim Scott, recently revealed that the Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act is making good progress and is expected to advance in the first round of Senate votes. But there's an interesting point here—the ethical clause regarding senior officials' involvement in digital asset activities has been temporarily set aside.

Scott explained that such ethical regulations fall under the jurisdiction of the Ethics Committee, and "it's much more difficult to incorporate them into the bill than one might imagine." In simple terms, issues related to potential conflicts of interest arising from former President Trump's holdings in cryptocurrencies are not expected to hinder the bill's progress in the short term.

Another noteworthy clue is that the design direction of the stablecoin reward mechanism is still being finalized. This legislative move signals to the crypto industry that the U.S. regulatory approach to digital assets has taken another step forward. $BTC $ETH

BTC-1,62%

ETH-3,74%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TradFiRefugee

· 01-16 09:15

Haha, let's put the moral clause aside for now. I've seen this trick too many times.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-15 09:48

lmao "ethics are hard" is exactly what they said before the dot-com bubble too... statistically speaking, we're hitting the same capitulation phase where regulators suddenly become *very flexible* about their principles. history rhymes fr

Reply0

WhaleStalker

· 01-15 00:12

Interesting, put the moral clauses aside for now, and prioritize protecting Trump's coin wallet first. This logic is brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainGossiper

· 01-14 23:00

Haha, let's put the moral clause aside for now. This move is also incredible. The rules of the game for the wealthy are just different.

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 01-14 22:59

It's the same old story, ethics are pushed to the back... The double standards of the elites are really impressive.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 01-14 22:58

Haha, it's hilarious. Moral clauses are set aside, this is politics, and conflicts of interest are simply ignored.

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 01-14 22:58

Haha, to be straightforward, it's just passing the ethical issues onto the committee. I give full marks for this move. By the way, Trump's coin must be guarded against, but it seems it can't stop the pace of the bill's progress. Stablecoins are still being refined; the details will determine success or failure. Anyway, that's just how the US operates.

View OriginalReply0

PermabullPete

· 01-14 22:57

Haha, this "ethical clause" has been shelved... Basically, it's just that the conflicts of interest among the big players are too complicated.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-14 22:57

Haha, this is politics. Let's put moral clauses aside for now; anyway, Trump's coin also needs to be protected.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuyer

· 01-14 22:41

Haha, still playing the "put it aside" game. The ethics committee is just a shield; frankly, they just don't want to deal with Trump's issues. Avoiding ethical clauses actually speeds up the legislation. That logic is just perfect—Americans are really good at playing this game. The stablecoin part hasn't been finalized yet, so there's still a long way to go. Keep watching the show.

View OriginalReply0