2026-01-14 22:35:53

Recently checked my SKR configuration in Seeker Vault, to be honest, it's pretty good. I've been using this product for quite some time.

But why haven't I made it my main wallet? Honestly, it's a privacy issue. The built-in monitoring tools in the system really make me uneasy.

However, I also wondered if it's possible to make some improvements, like certain privacy solutions do. For example, removing unnecessary tracking mechanisms. If this could be addressed, I would definitely consider making it my primary daily wallet.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SandwichVictim

· 01-16 07:45

Privacy is indeed a weakness of Seeker Vault; otherwise, it would have been used long ago.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirrel

· 01-15 16:15

The monitoring tools and those things are really a sore point, but to be honest, fully resolving this depends on the official attitude. Don't just wait around.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-14 23:05

Privacy is indeed a major weakness; if it weren't for those tracking mechanisms, the main players would have already taken over.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-14 23:01

Privacy is indeed a pain point, and Seeker's monitoring logic really goes a bit overboard...

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-14 22:57

Privacy is indeed a weakness, but it must be acknowledged that SKR's stability is still acceptable.

View OriginalReply0

Frontrunner

· 01-14 22:56

Privacy has indeed been a common topic, but if SKR can truly eliminate tracking, I might have to reconsider.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-14 22:54

There are piles of monitoring tools, which is like embedding a bunch of backdoors in smart contracts... Frankly, it's still a trust issue. --- The SKR configuration itself is fine, but the privacy design approach feels a bit like leaving evidence on the chain, which makes me uneasy. --- Can removing the tracking mechanism turn things around? Not that simple; it requires a complete overhaul at the architecture level. --- I've heard too many claims of "possible improvements," but the key is to look at the audit reports. --- Privacy isn't just about adding a switch; it depends on whether there are fundamental vulnerabilities. --- It's still early for SKR to become the main wallet; the privacy aspects need a thorough review before I dare to touch it.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-14 22:46

ngl the surveillance theater they're running there is basically asking you to brew your alpha in a fishbowl... dark pools exist for a reason, no?

Reply0