You ever think about how most public blockchains end up cramming everything onto the chain? Then you watch them choke—congestion spikes, transaction costs skyrocket, everyone's staring at pending queues.
It's a real design trap. The whole system grinds itself down trying to process everything on-chain.
That's exactly what local execution models solve. Instead of dumping all computation onto the blockchain itself, the heavy lifting happens on your device. You run the proof locally, then only settle the verification on-chain. Smart, right?
It's that shift from "chain does everything" to "user-side execution + chain validation" that actually makes scaling work without compromising security.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BTCRetirementFund
· 01-16 23:37
Running this locally essentially saves on gas fees, but the problem is, who guarantees that the proof you run locally is correct...
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 01-16 02:46
Executing this theory locally sounds good, but very few projects can truly be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 01-14 23:09
Hmm... it's that same "local execution" explanation again. It's been a while since the last time the project team promised this, and the database still shows it as pending.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-14 22:44
Local execution really is the key to breaking through, on-chain stacking should have been thrown in the trash long ago.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 01-14 22:43
Nah, this is the right way. On-chain heavy calculations are suicide; it should have been designed this way long ago.
You ever think about how most public blockchains end up cramming everything onto the chain? Then you watch them choke—congestion spikes, transaction costs skyrocket, everyone's staring at pending queues.
It's a real design trap. The whole system grinds itself down trying to process everything on-chain.
That's exactly what local execution models solve. Instead of dumping all computation onto the blockchain itself, the heavy lifting happens on your device. You run the proof locally, then only settle the verification on-chain. Smart, right?
It's that shift from "chain does everything" to "user-side execution + chain validation" that actually makes scaling work without compromising security.