Does storing each KV pair make sense? Especially when the model only queries a small portion of them in practice.
The idea behind KVzap is straightforward—by learning to identify which cache entries are unlikely to be used in subsequent queries and proactively deleting them. The result is that the cache size can be compressed to 1/2 to 1/4 of the original, with almost no impact on performance.
This intelligent, dynamic dependency-based KV cache pruning method has practical significance for improving model inference efficiency and reducing storage costs. Especially in large-scale deployment scenarios, the potential for optimization is quite substantial.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-17 21:02
Storing redundant KV pairs is like stockpiling supplies on the battlefield that you can't use — it takes up space and slows you down. The KVzap compression operation that reduces it to 1/4 feels like someone finally took the time to do the math seriously.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 01-17 20:23
Haha, isn't this just the decluttering of KV cache? Finally, someone has figured this out.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 01-16 00:38
Oh my god, finally someone is doing this. I always thought it was a waste and really wasted storing so much junk data.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 01-14 23:49
Isn't this just messing around? The previous KV caching strategies were really a waste... Compressing to a quarter and still running, not bad.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 01-14 23:46
Haha, isn't this the old problem of wasting storage space finally being properly solved? The KVzap approach is really refreshing.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 01-14 23:43
This is a truly pragmatic optimization approach, not just optimizing for the sake of optimization. Reducing the compression ratio from 1/2 to 1/4 directly cuts costs.
Does storing each KV pair make sense? Especially when the model only queries a small portion of them in practice.
The idea behind KVzap is straightforward—by learning to identify which cache entries are unlikely to be used in subsequent queries and proactively deleting them. The result is that the cache size can be compressed to 1/2 to 1/4 of the original, with almost no impact on performance.
This intelligent, dynamic dependency-based KV cache pruning method has practical significance for improving model inference efficiency and reducing storage costs. Especially in large-scale deployment scenarios, the potential for optimization is quite substantial.