Real wealth accumulation in the crypto era follows a peculiar logic. You manufacture tangible goods—vehicles, infrastructure, space technology—then convert them into digital numbers. That's not acquisitiveness; that's the game itself. The assets get dematerialized into spreadsheets and blockchain entries. Those who consolidate power through coercion play by older rules, demanding compliance through force. But in decentralized systems, the mechanism reverses entirely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTBlackHole
· 01-17 22:22
I've seen through the logic of digitizing real assets a long time ago. The problem is that most people are still playing the old power game.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 01-16 19:19
The real wealth game is like this: building cars and infrastructure all need to be on the blockchain, or how else to play? The old tricks are still using fists to speak, but decentralization has long since turned the tables. This is the future logic.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 01-15 00:00
Is that it? Turning physical assets into digital ones is called a revolution? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlert
· 01-14 23:58
In simple terms, it's about digitizing physical assets and playing with them on the blockchain. This logic is indeed brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnight
· 01-14 23:53
That's very true. The current logic is... creating physical entities and then digitizing them, playing with this very system.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 01-14 23:48
Well said, the digitalization of physical assets is essentially a process of reassigning rights. The centralized forced logic should have been eliminated long ago.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-14 23:47
This is the core of Web3: digitalizing physical assets and putting them on the blockchain. The traditional authoritative enforcement methods are directly ineffective here.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-14 23:46
The real world and the on-chain world are completely separate; traditional authoritative methods really don't work here.
View OriginalReply0
SelfStaking
· 01-14 23:33
It sounds like the logic of bringing physical assets onto the blockchain. To be honest, this is the process of transferring power from the physical to the digital. Whoever controls the code becomes the landlord of the new era.
Real wealth accumulation in the crypto era follows a peculiar logic. You manufacture tangible goods—vehicles, infrastructure, space technology—then convert them into digital numbers. That's not acquisitiveness; that's the game itself. The assets get dematerialized into spreadsheets and blockchain entries. Those who consolidate power through coercion play by older rules, demanding compliance through force. But in decentralized systems, the mechanism reverses entirely.