2026-01-14 23:39:55

Some leading exchanges have listed many projects of varying quality. Early investors probably have a deep impression of this phenomenon. Or are you referring to those projects on other platforms? Veteran players are definitely very familiar with these tactics.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiDoctor

· 01-17 22:34

Trading records show that the clinical performance of the head exchange's project was truly shocking, and early investors mostly learned their lessons the hard way. --- That's why I've always emphasized the importance of regularly reviewing on-chain data. Relying solely on exchange endorsements is not enough; risk alerts must be self-activated. --- Strategy complications arise. The capital outflow symptoms of that batch of projects were already very obvious at the time, yet some people still rushed in. --- The screening mechanism of top exchanges has always been like this. No matter how perfect the liquidity indicators are, they can't fix the hidden risks in protocol code—that's a hard flaw. --- Experienced players should know that listing ≠ endorsement, and certainly not safety. After playing this game for so many years, it's truly surprising that some people still fall for it...

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-17 21:04

We are the ones who invested early in those trash projects. Looking back, it's really hard to find anything to laugh about. There are only a few real projects launched by top exchanges, yet we're repeatedly cut. But who still falls for it now? We've seen all the tricks too many times. These exchanges really dare to list anything. Old players are already immune. We did get caught once back then, but now it's just a lesson learned.

View OriginalReply0

BlockTalk

· 01-16 17:04

The tears of early investors are all condensed in these "uneven" ones, haha

View OriginalReply0

GasGoblin

· 01-15 00:07

Oh, don't mention it. I've seen through those exchanges' money-making tactics a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

MissedTheBoat

· 01-15 00:01

Early investors? Ha, those who got burned are the ones who truly went deep.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 01-15 00:01

Bro, I've seen this trick back in 2018. I lost everything and only then realized it. Now I've learned my lesson and become smarter, so I need to have a discerning eye.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHomeless

· 01-14 23:56

Wow, that early batch of projects was really outrageous, with a bunch of them breaking even right after launch.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller