2026-01-15 00:43:57

Sam might claim he holds no OpenAI stock, but the plot thickens when you look at his portfolio in the company's partners. Smart move or just playing the angles?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotFinancialAdvice

· 01-17 04:47

Ha Sam, I've seen through this set of words a long time ago. Anyway, it's all hidden in the partners, playing tricks with the left hand and the right hand.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 01-16 13:01

Here we go again, with this set of excuses... claiming not to hold shares, then immediately lurking in the partner list. It's a typical regulatory evasion trick, thinking we can't see through it.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 01-15 12:26

Isn't this just a classic case of "I don't hold shares, but my friend does"? Playing word games, huh?

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 01-15 01:13

A typical case of the left hand doing the opposite of the right hand; I've seen this trick way too many times...

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 01-15 01:05

This strategy is quite deep, it looks like just playing word games. No direct shareholding, instead transferring benefits from partners, truly clever...

View OriginalReply0

WealthCoffee

· 01-15 01:04

Hmm... I see through this tactic. On the surface, they say they don't hold shares, but then they lay in wait at related parties. Truly skilled at playing the game.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichDetector

· 01-15 00:55

Ah, you're playing word games again. Not holding shares actually means indirectly holding through the partner’s investment portfolio. How awkward.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropJunkie

· 01-15 00:49

Another "I don't have" trick... well, actually I do

View OriginalReply0