A leading compliance-focused exchange CEO recently made a strong statement on crypto market structure legislation, signaling a critical shift in industry positioning. The executive stated unequivocally: "We'd rather have no bill than a bad bill"—rejecting the current proposal being considered for cryptocurrency and digital asset regulation. This stance reflects growing industry concerns that poorly crafted legislation could stifle innovation and market development rather than provide the clarity the crypto sector desperately needs. The declaration marks an important moment in the ongoing debate over how digital assets should be governed, with major players now drawing lines on what regulatory frameworks they can accept.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
26 Likes
Reward
26
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-18 00:43
no bill > bad bill, this guy's got a point. Better to have nothing than be trapped in a bad situation.
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recovery
· 01-17 19:29
ngl this "no bill vs bad bill" energy hits different after watching leverage liquidate half the market lol... like we finally learned position sizing matters, now regulators gotta learn the same lesson. can't let one bad regulation blow up the whole sector fr fr
Reply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-16 06:33
No bill is better than a bad bill—that's a nice way to put it... but can it really withstand policy pressure?
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 01-15 21:56
No bill is better than a bad bill, I just can't argue with that logic haha
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-15 01:18
This CEO is right, a bad bill is worse than no bill at all. It would be even more painful if innovation is truly killed.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-15 01:18
I like this stance of nah, much better than those exchanges that are trying to cozy up to regulators... I would rather have no good bills than compromise; this is true integrity.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeir
· 01-15 01:13
It should be pointed out that this CEO's statement actually reveals a deep-rooted dilemma of value consensus — whether regulators and industry players can find the intersection between technological fundamentals and legal frameworks. According to the original intention of the white paper, we should not fall into a binary dilemma of "choosing compromise or confrontation."
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinking
· 01-15 01:12
I like this attitude of nah. Instead of being trapped by bad legislation, it's better to have no rules for now.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 01-15 00:57
No bill is more suffocating than bad bill... If this continues, crypto will truly become a synonym for the dark web.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 01-15 00:54
Rather than getting trapped, it's better to wait patiently. Anyway, once the bill is ruined, it's all over.
A leading compliance-focused exchange CEO recently made a strong statement on crypto market structure legislation, signaling a critical shift in industry positioning. The executive stated unequivocally: "We'd rather have no bill than a bad bill"—rejecting the current proposal being considered for cryptocurrency and digital asset regulation. This stance reflects growing industry concerns that poorly crafted legislation could stifle innovation and market development rather than provide the clarity the crypto sector desperately needs. The declaration marks an important moment in the ongoing debate over how digital assets should be governed, with major players now drawing lines on what regulatory frameworks they can accept.