2026-01-15 01:39:33

The $RIVER project has sparked heated discussions, with concerning reasons. It has been observed that the token is under highly centralized control, with supply manipulated by market makers. Under this model, retail investors become the main victims—market makers achieve mass liquidations through carefully designed mechanisms, causing a large amount of retail funds to evaporate. Even more outrageous, after the liquidations are completed, the project team allows the token price to freely decline, with a cumulative drop of up to 70%. This "bloodsucking first, then collapse" tactic has severely damaged the reputation of the entire crypto market. Similar control and liquidity trap phenomena are not uncommon, and investors should remain vigilant.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeSurvivor

· 01-17 16:19

It's the same old story again. $RIVER is playing it way too obvious this time. A 70% drop and still calling it a free fall? Laughable, it's just blatant harvesting. I've said it before, market makers and project teams are in cahoots, retail investors are just grass-cutting machines in the leek field. Wake up, everyone. How many times do I have to say this... Liquidity traps are just gambling, betting on being smarter than the house. And the result? It looks pretty uncomfortable, really. Every time, new retail investors get caught in the trap.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-addcaaf7

· 01-17 12:59

Another typical rug pull scheme, a 70% drop makes my scalp tingle. Retail investors have once again become the chives this time; market makers manipulating prices is truly incredible. The RIVER project is a textbook-level harvesting mechanism; you need to be more cautious. They clear out their positions and then let the price fall; this tactic is just too blatant. I just want to ask, how can market makers manipulate supply so freely? Is no one regulating this? Tokens with such centralized control should have been blacklisted long ago; who would still dare to touch them? Liquidity traps keep appearing one after another, making the entire market feel like a trap. The RIVER case can once again attract a wave of followers; it's really ironic.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTrooper

· 01-15 20:35

It's the same old trick again—market makers suck the liquidity dry and then run, retail investors get stuck holding the bag, and a 70% drop is painful to watch.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 01-15 02:09

Here we go again with the old tricks, market makers bleeding, retail investors taking the hit, project teams running away. After a 70% drop, are people still calling for the bottom? --- $RIVER this thing is really incredible. With such high concentration, it dares to go live. Who gave them the courage? --- I've seen through this liquidity trap long ago. It's always the same script every time. --- Another example of a rug pull. I advise everyone not to touch these highly controlled coins. --- That's why I only buy large-cap coins. Small-cap tokens are too risky. --- After clearing the position, letting the price drop freely? That's laughable. Isn't that just blatant manipulation? --- Retail investors have become the bagholders again. When will they learn their lesson? --- Market makers' tricks are really endless and hard to defend against. --- A 70% drop... I bet it will fall even further below five dollars.

View OriginalReply0

MetaNeighbor

· 01-15 02:09

Here is the translation: Again with this routine... Market makers pump and dump retail investors, project teams sit back and profit, while we suffer heavy losses. --- $RIVER this wave is a textbook-level rug pull, a 70% drop—what does that indicate? It shows that no one cares about retail investors' lives or deaths. --- Centralized control + liquidity traps, this combo skill is now too common, I'm done. --- Why do people still dare to invest in such projects? If the liquidity is so fake, why take the risk? --- After liquidation, they dump the price—truly ruthless. Isn't this just planned harvesting? --- Still debating whether to buy $RIVER? Projects like this should have been blacklisted long ago. --- Retail investors really need to be more cautious; the routines of market makers are more outrageous than the last.

View OriginalReply0

ChainProspector

· 01-15 02:04

It's the same old trick again, market makers bleeding retail investors to buy the dip, truly impressive. --- 70% drop? Why not just go to zero directly, since it's all about cutting losses anyway. --- I've seen through $RIVER from the start; with such fake liquidity, who can't tell? --- It happens every time, project teams and market makers working together, retail investors are just the big fools. --- I knew it, ignoring so many red flags, I should have seen it coming. --- A typical rug pull variant, with such high concentration that people still rush in? Really. --- I don't even bother looking at these projects now; they're all fake at first glance, and the liquidation mechanisms are a trap from the start. --- Why are people still falling for such basic tricks? Is doing research really that hard? --- On-chain data can tell you the token distribution at a glance; if you don't check, you only have yourself to blame.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 01-15 01:54

It's the same old trick again: market makers suck the liquidity dry and then run, leaving retail investors to cover the bills.

View OriginalReply0

TrustlessMaximalist

· 01-15 01:45

It's the same old trick again. I can see through RIVER's routine with my eyes closed. It's always like this—market makers drain liquidity and then run, retail investors are left holding the bag and have to endure a 70% drop... It's really outrageous. Projects with centralized control are not worth touching at all; liquidity traps are everywhere.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-15 01:43

It's the same old story again. The $RIVER thing is a typical high-controlled supply + liquidity trapping. How can retail investors compete with the market maker's mechanism design...

View OriginalReply0