Looking at the development directions of these emerging social applications, I always feel a bit disappointed. Nowadays, trading tools are everywhere, and the market is not short of applications directly used for trading.
Is the path of crypto social networking really feasible? On the Farcaster platform, we have indeed seen some truly eye-catching innovations—concepts like mini-program frameworks combined with social tipping features. These ideas are inherently promising. If the main application of Base can make some adjustments in certain key designs, honestly, I think there is still a chance to succeed. The issue is not the direction, but rather that there is still plenty of room for refinement in the execution details.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoGovernanceOfficer
· 01-17 23:41
empirically speaking, farcaster's framework is interesting but execution matters way more than vibes. the data on social token adoption literally shows us what works and what doesn't. kinda tired of hearing "it'll work if we just tweak x" without actual kpis though ngl
Reply0
NervousFingers
· 01-17 20:09
A pile of trading tools, but the truly playable social products are scarce.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-16 11:19
yo, farcaster's got the ritual down but they're still fumbling the transmutation... the real alpha's hidden in the execution details, not the grand grimoire they're peddling ngl
Reply0
RiddleMaster
· 01-16 02:21
A bunch of trading tools, but truly innovative social applications are still rare. I've looked into Farcaster's tipping framework, and it's quite interesting. I'm just worried it might end up failing again.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatcher
· 01-15 02:10
Execution details are the real killer, and Farcaster's framework is indeed quite impressive. It all depends on whether Base can truly implement it.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 01-15 02:08
Farcaster's mini program frameworks are really good, but the problem is that the execution layer always underperforms. Details determine success or failure.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 01-15 01:56
Farcaster does have some ideas, but frankly, it still depends on execution... The combination of mini-programs and tipping will only be worth looking forward to if it truly comes to fruition.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOP
· 01-15 01:55
Oh my, Farcaster's mini-program + tipping is really awesome. Just worried that Base might mess it up again.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 01-15 01:44
A bunch of trading tools, but truly innovative social applications are still few. Farcaster's approach of mini-programs combined with tipping is indeed interesting; it all depends on whether Base can refine the details properly.
Looking at the development directions of these emerging social applications, I always feel a bit disappointed. Nowadays, trading tools are everywhere, and the market is not short of applications directly used for trading.
Is the path of crypto social networking really feasible? On the Farcaster platform, we have indeed seen some truly eye-catching innovations—concepts like mini-program frameworks combined with social tipping features. These ideas are inherently promising. If the main application of Base can make some adjustments in certain key designs, honestly, I think there is still a chance to succeed. The issue is not the direction, but rather that there is still plenty of room for refinement in the execution details.