From 2018 to 2020, the account experienced a complete zeroing out. The subsequent cycle from 2020 to 2024 almost followed the same path. By mid-2025, history nearly repeated itself, approaching wipeout again.



Carefully reflecting on my personality and trading habits, continuing to play like this is too risky. The probability of losing everything is constantly increasing.

Decided to make a change in 2026—first, isolate the core assets as a safety baseline, and use the remaining small funds to continue fighting in the market. This way, I can satisfy my trading desires while limiting the single-loss ceiling. Reduce the risk from "total wipeout" to "within an acceptable range."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
HashRateHustlervip
· 01-21 10:40
Another three-year cycle... Can it be changed this time, really?

---

That's very true. Isolating assets is a reliable move, definitely better than all-in.

---

Three resets to zero and still gambling, what are you thinking?

---

Controlling the desire to operate is key, otherwise another round will still end in failure.

---

This is the so-called "learning from setbacks" version, right?

---

I'm also engaging in small-scale bets, just depends on self-discipline or not.

---

Only after repeatedly hitting rock bottom do I understand, me too.

---

Daring to continue after three resets to zero, quite brave.

---

I copied the move of isolating core assets.

---

Wait, only changing in 2026? Can't it be now?
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippavip
· 01-21 01:35
Three times falling into the same pit, this guy has finally understood

---

Reset to zero three times and still not giving up, this mindset is incredible

---

Isolating assets is not a bad move, at least better than continuing self-destructive trading

---

It sounds like a fight for survival, but in reality, the gambler's fate still can't be changed

---

Being able to recognize oneself is good enough, most people simply won't reflect

---

Changing in 2026? I bet five bucks it will happen again

---

The idea of isolating core assets is good, but execution is the key

---

History has repeated itself three times, can willpower alone change it this time? I don't quite believe it
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTarotReadervip
· 01-18 12:56
It's been three times... really should change it, or else it's truly uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 01-18 12:56
Three near bankruptcy times and still haven't learned. Luckily, I remembered there's still hope.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_againvip
· 01-18 12:55
Ha, repeating the same story again... Really need to establish a fixed position, or else I'll have to go through it again.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForevervip
· 01-18 12:52
Gone back to zero again? Bro, this is the third time, you're getting a bit addicted.

---

I believe in the move of isolating assets, the key is whether you can actually execute it.

---

Really, you need to learn to lock your desires in a cage.

---

There are too many people who haven't awakened after three resets; this guy can be considered to have truly repented.

---

If you can hold on until 2026, that's a win. The first two times, you probably made the same pledge.

---

Fighting is right, but the premise is to preserve the principal.

---

This allocation is indeed reasonable; as long as the core assets are protected, the mindset will be stable.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChainvip
· 01-18 12:39
Zeroed out three times? Man, you must have incredible mental resilience... But on the other hand, isolating assets is still a reliable move; it's definitely better than risking your life continuing to gamble.
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamervip
· 01-18 12:35
Three times to zero, brother. Are you finally going to learn to cut losses this time?

---

If trading is truly a terminal illness, then continuing like this calls for writing a will.

---

The strategy of isolating core assets is quite sensible; it all depends on how many months you can stick with it.

---

Changing in 2026 again; why didn't I think this way last year?

---

What sounds nice is "small-scale fighting," but frankly, it's just gamblers' self-deception.

---

At least you're starting to reflect, which is better than continuing to court death.

---

Every time you talk about change, but in the next bull market, your true colors show again.

---

I don't buy it. If you could truly bear the risks, you wouldn't keep resetting to zero.

---

Knowing people and oneself but not understanding the market—that's what you're missing.

---

The step of isolating assets should have been done earlier, but execution is a problem.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin