Alternative investment boom coming? Global regulatory framework improving, institutional capital pouring in

Question

【Crypto World】Alternative investments have really gained popularity in the past two years. The data shows this—projected to soar from $15 trillion in 2022 to over $24 trillion by 2028. There are two key drivers behind this: first, the appeal of diversified portfolios, and second, the demonstrated risk resistance during times of economic uncertainty.

More importantly, the regulatory frameworks of major global economies are rapidly improving. The EU has already taken action with the “Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation” (MiCA), providing a unified set of rules for the entire market. The UK is also not idle, currently trialing a digital securities sandbox. The US Congress has passed the “GENIUS Act,” specifically targeting stablecoin regulation.

Asian markets are moving even faster—Hong Kong and Singapore, two financial hubs, are actively promoting the development of crypto ETFs and tokenized assets. Especially Singapore, which directly classifies digital asset tokens as securities, clearing legal obstacles for institutional participation.

Would you think strict regulation would dampen market enthusiasm? Quite the opposite. A clear legal framework actually does two things: enhances legal certainty and boosts the reputation of this asset class. As a result, institutional capital is pouring in, transforming alternative investments from “retail playthings” into a “formal game” for professionals.

SoliditySlayer · Accepted Answer

Regulation is coming, and institutions are just keeping up. We've seen this routine before. After the introduction of MiCA, projects in Europe have indeed become a bit more active, but the real positive news still depends on Asia. Singapore and Hong Kong have finally taken it seriously this time.

Honestly, once digital asset tokenization is recognized as securities, the threshold becomes higher, and retail investors' opportunities decrease. The figure of 24 trillion sounds impressive, but it's still the institutions who benefit the most.

Improved regulation is a good thing, but don't be fooled—it's important to understand where the money is flowing and who truly benefits.

TestnetNomad · Answer

The improvement of the regulatory framework is a signal for institutional entry; this wave is indeed different.

GlueGuy · Answer

Improving the regulatory framework requires institutions to follow suit, and this logic makes sense... However, we have to wait until this wave in Singapore is truly implemented to be valid.

shadowy_supercoder · Answer

Will the regulatory framework be truly ready once it is improved? I think it still depends on how institutions actually invest their real money.

Singapore's recent moves are indeed aggressive—treating tokens directly as securities. If Hong Kong and the US follow suit, it will take a while to finalize.

A market cap of 24 trillion sounds great, but in reality, institutional entry remains very cautious... How many times have we said that strong risk resistance is essential?

MiCA has been implemented for a while, so why does the market still feel the same? Regulation ≠ dividends, brother.

Asia is really rushing ahead; while Europe and the US are still in meetings and discussions, they are already getting started.

GateUser-7b078580 · Answer

The data shows that the figure of 24 trillion... Although, during historical lows, we've also seen similar predictions. Let's wait and see.

Will the regulatory framework be complete once MiCA is implemented? Unreasonable mechanisms still run rampant. The observed pattern is that more and more gas costs are being absorbed by miners.

Singapore treats tokens as securities. Before institutions enter the market, they should first calculate the hourly costs. It's hard to say how long this wave can last.

WhaleMinion · Answer

Once the regulatory framework is improved, institutions will enter the market. We've seen this script too many times.

Wait, 24 trillion? How is this number calculated? It seems a bit exaggerated.

Singapore's move is indeed aggressive, directly classifying cryptocurrencies under the securities framework, which is essentially a form of recognition.

After MiCA was introduced, Europe really started to ramp up competition. Asia can't just sit and wait.

By the way, could this wave be another prelude for institutions to harvest retail investors? History always repeats itself.

AlphaLeaker · Answer

Is a完善 of the regulatory framework enough to enter the market? I don't think so; it depends on who sets the rules.

Singapore treating tokens as securities is basically still trapping retail investors.

The 24 trillion sounds impressive, but how many institutions can actually benefit?

MiCA coming is actually a negative signal; who will bear the compliance costs?

If Europe and America can't regulate, will Asia step in to sell? That's interesting.

Don't be fooled by the data this time; institutional entry ≠ ordinary people can make money.

Gm_Gn_Merchant · Answer

Improving the regulatory framework is indeed a good thing, but the question is whether latecomers can really catch up. Hong Kong and Singapore are taking action, while the US is still dragging its feet. The gap seems to be widening.

Alternative investment boom coming? Global regulatory framework improving, institutional capital pouring in

Trending Topics

GateLaunchesGateforAI

CryptoMarketsDipSlightly

GoldAndSilverMoveHigher

USIranTensionsImpactMarkets

AISectorRisesAgainstTheTrend

Hot Gate Fun

熊大快跑

熊大快跑

ibox

ibox起飞

伊朗货币

伊朗货币

YL

伊朗🇮🇷

🙂

ETH

Pin