VANRY believes that transaction processing speed is no longer the core competitiveness? Let me tell you, @vanarchain, I think this project, TPS and so on, really aren't a big deal anymore. It's not that speed isn't important, but it’s already no longer a competitive edge; everyone is about the same. First of all, now with AI + on-chain projects, who still cares about hundreds of transactions per second? People want AI to thrive on the chain, and they need something... how should I put it, the chain must "understand" AI! It needs memory, to remember what AI did or discussed before, to infer context, to help AI think and make judgments, and it must be able to act independently without humans staring at it 24/7. Plus, it needs to handle payments properly, both domestically and internationally, complying with regulations, and avoiding being blocked easily. Out of these requirements, which have anything to do with TPS? Even if your TPS hits ten thousand per second, without these functionalities, AI can't operate properly on the chain. It’s just a fast-running shell with no real use. VANRY focuses on these "AI-ready" features, so it’s not bothered by constantly shouting about how fast it is.

Secondly, honestly, speed in Web3 has long become a commodity. Who doesn’t have blocks confirmed in a few seconds? In the past, some chains took two minutes to produce a block, so the faster one was considered impressive and could attract some traffic. But now? Any decent public chain can confirm transactions in seconds, which is standard now. If you still use this as your main selling point, people will just say, “So what?” and you won’t stand out. It’s even more amusing when some chains try to boast about being super fast by risking stability and security, resulting in frequent freezes and crashes. AI fears this the most—if the network jitters or the chain hangs, the task is immediately doomed, causing huge losses. VANRY’s 3-second confirmation time is already enough; being stable and reliable is what matters. Why push for 0.1 seconds and risk crashing yourself? No need, brother.

Third, and most annoying, the real bottleneck that stalls AI on-chain isn’t slow TPS, but those nasty pain points! For example, data storage costs are exorbitant; AI often needs several GBs of data, and storing it on-chain could bankrupt you. Also, chains seem to be enemies with each other—AI data and tasks clash, making scaling and computing power difficult. AI training and inference require massive computing resources, which are hard to mobilize on-chain. The most critical issue is that AI agents can’t properly use wallets or make global payments—many chains haven’t even considered this need. These are the real roadblocks!

VANRY is working on these things—cross-chain with Base, myNeutron data storage, Kayon inference, Flows automation, and compliant payment channels... these are the things that can truly keep AI alive! Compared to pointless competition like “I’m 0.5 seconds faster,” these are much more meaningful. For a project like VANRY, which is dedicated to native AI infrastructure, TPS is just a passing grade, 60 points is enough; it’s sufficient. Its real strength lies in solving the genuine problems that AI developers complain about daily, enabling AI agents to truly thrive on-chain and do long-term work. Those traditional public chains still brag about “being the fastest TPS,” but they are not even in the same race as VANRY. One is competing on the speed limit, the other on whether AI can survive. The difference is huge, hahaha. 😅😅😅$VANRY #Vanar