From this round in the BNB ecosystem, I have an increasingly clear feeling: Launchpad is splitting into two types of things. One is a "pure token issuance tool," and the other is moving towards "token infrastructure." Flap appears to start from a launchpad, but what it does has already gone beyond the level of "help you launch a coin." Let's first discuss the most core issue: why have Meme/community coins been short-lived over the past two years? It's not because the narrative is weak, but because on-chain projects almost lack sustainable "internal cash flow." The common characteristics are: 0 tax → projects have no money, high tax → high trading slippage → liquidity dies even faster. This has been a structural contradiction that has persisted. Burn → control supply structure, dividends → passive incentives for holders, add liquidity → hedge panic selling pressure, project fund pools → ensure continuous operation. The significance of this step is not about "more options," but about: for the first time, projects have a sustainable "financial system" on-chain. Only then can we talk about roadmaps, iterations, and development. This is also why I initially said to see Flap as modular infrastructure for token economics, rather than a Meme platform. Going deeper, currently Flap supports multiple chains (BNB/Xlayer/Monad/Morph), with the same token issuance and tax logic, which can be replicated across different ecosystems. It’s not about betting on the traffic cycle of a single chain, but about betting on a new token issuance paradigm. 👉 Moving from "token issuance tool" 👉 to "composable token infrastructure." Continuing to expand capabilities at the infrastructure layer, developers can do more interesting and unconventional experiments around Flap. Its ceiling won't just be Meme Launchpad.