Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Carolyn Allison sentenced to two years for involvement in the largest cryptocurrency scam
The Federal Court of New York has sentenced Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison to 24 months of imprisonment in a minimum-security correctional facility near Boston. Additionally, the 29-year-old Ellison will pay a fine of approximately $11 billion and serve a three-year probation period after release. Judge Lewis Kaplan’s decision concluded an investigation into one of the largest financial crimes in the country’s history.
Court Proceedings and the Key Role of Testimony
The court’s decision was based on Ellison’s active cooperation with law enforcement authorities. She served as a key witness against Sam Bankman-Fried, founder and CEO of FTX, who was also her former partner. During the 2024 trial, Ellison testified about attempts to bribe foreign officials and providing creditors with knowingly false financial reports. U.S. Assistant Prosecutor Daniel Sassoon noted in his address to the court that Ellison’s testimony was the cornerstone in convicting Bankman-Fried on all seven counts of fraud and conspiracy.
Judge’s Assessment: Acknowledgment of Manipulation and Remorse
Judge Kaplan showed some sympathy towards Caroline Ellison, noting that she was in a vulnerable position and was influenced. Before announcing the sentence, he said: “You were defenseless and manipulated. You sincerely regret your actions.” Kaplan emphasized Ellison’s exceptional cooperation, stating that in his thirty years of legal practice, he had not encountered such a level of assistance.
However, the judge also pointed out the seriousness of the crime: “In a case of this magnitude, avoiding prison is impossible despite the cooperation provided.” He stressed that although Bankman-Fried did not show remorse, Ellison demonstrates genuine regret for her actions.
Contrast with the Sentence of FTX Founder
Differences in the judicial approach to the two key figures of Alameda Research and FTX proved significant. Bankman-Fried was found guilty on all charges in early 2024 and received a 25-year sentence. Caroline Ellison, as an actively cooperating party, received a substantially shorter sentence. Bankman-Fried is currently appealing his conviction.
Plea and Personal Statement
Before reading the sentence, Caroline Ellison made a brief statement, asking for forgiveness from the affected FTX and Alameda Research clients, colleagues, friends, and family. She highlighted the difficulty of comprehending large sums of money: “The human brain struggles to grasp the scale of numbers. I cannot imagine the pain I caused.”
Ellison also reflected on her past, recalling that in 2018 she had no premonition of the upcoming events: “If someone had told me back then that I would admit to financial fraud, I would have thought they were crazy.” She acknowledged that each stage of the process became more difficult to escape, and expressed regret over a lack of courage at critical moments.
Execution of the Sentence and Conditions of Detention
According to the court’s decision, Caroline Ellison has approximately 45 days to voluntarily surrender to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and begin serving her sentence. As a federal offense, her term allows for a minimum of parole only after serving at least 75 percent of the assigned sentence. The choice of facility near Boston, where Ellison’s family resides, was based on personal circumstances considered during sentencing.