The American dream of homeownership has become increasingly elusive, even for those earning well into the upper middle class income bracket. A comprehensive Zoocasa analysis examining housing affordability across 100 major U.S. cities revealed a sobering reality: while upper-middle-class buyers can afford median-priced homes in 85 cities, there are 15 major markets where even these affluent earners struggle to purchase a typical house.
Understanding the Upper-Middle-Class Income Gap
The middle class spans a broad income range—from roughly two-thirds to twice the median income—creating stark differences in purchasing power. While lower-middle-class earners cannot afford a median-priced home in any major city analyzed, upper-middle-class Americans were expected to have access to homeownership in most markets. The discovery that 15 cities have priced out even these higher earners signals a critical shift in housing accessibility.
Upper-middle-class income thresholds vary significantly by region and household structure, typically ranging from $100,000 to $250,000 annually depending on local median income levels. Yet even these substantial earnings prove insufficient in America’s most expensive real estate markets.
The 15 Cities Where Upper-Middle-Class House Purchases Become Unaffordable
California Markets Dominate the Unaffordable List
California cities occupy a commanding position on this list, with six of the fifteen most unaffordable markets located in the state:
San Jose leads the crisis: With a median home price of $2,020,000 and maximum affordable prices near $1,223,956 for upper-middle-class earners, the gap reaches $796,044—by far the largest affordability shortfall of any city analyzed.
Orange County properties remain out of reach: Both Anaheim and Santa Ana show median prices of $1,450,000, with upper-middle-class buyers able to afford only $762,536 and $771,898 respectively, creating gaps exceeding $680,000. Irvine, also in Orange County, shows a more modest but still significant gap of $300,077.
Bay Area challenges extend beyond Silicon Valley: Oakland and San Francisco both exceed $1.3 million in median pricing. While San Francisco’s upper-middle-class affordability ceiling of $1,138,612 creates a $181,388 gap, Oakland’s shortfall reaches $450,044 despite slightly lower median prices.
Southern California coastal properties command premium prices: Long Beach, San Diego, and Los Angeles all appear on the list, with gaps ranging from $93,407 in Long Beach to $146,523 in Los Angeles. Chula Vista rounds out California’s representation, with the smallest gap among California entries at $16,948.
Non-California Markets Show Varying Severity
Beyond California, five cities spanning different regions demonstrate that housing affordability challenges extend nationwide:
Honolulu ($1,165,100 median, $402,249 gap) reflects Hawaii’s unique geographic constraints and limited housing supply. Newark, New Jersey ($660,000 median, $176,470 gap) shows that even northern metro areas face considerable challenges. New York City demonstrates surprising relative affordability compared to West Coast markets, with a median price of $725,300 and a smaller gap of $37,290—suggesting that even the nation’s financial capital has modestly more accessible entry points for upper-middle-class buyers.
Miami ($643,900 median, $27,246 gap) and Scottsdale ($1,178,000 median, $225,117 gap) round out the non-California entries, each representing regional wealth centers where upper-middle-class earners find themselves priced at the margins of feasibility.
Why These Markets Remain Unaffordable for Upper-Middle-Class Homebuyers
The concentration of California cities reflects broader trends in tech-sector wealth accumulation, foreign investment, and limited housing supply in desirable coastal markets. These factors have driven median prices to levels that fundamentally outpace even substantial upper-middle-class incomes.
The affordability gap represents the difference between what upper-middle-class earners can financially access (typically calculated at 4-5 times annual income) and what properties actually cost. In San Jose, this gap exceeds three-quarters of a million dollars. Even in Miami, where the gap appears smallest at $27,246, upper-middle-class buyers operate with virtually no financial cushion.
Key Takeaway for Upper-Middle-Class Home Seekers
The reality that 15 major American cities have become completely unaffordable even for upper-middle-class house purchases reflects unprecedented strain in housing markets. These findings underscore that income level alone no longer guarantees residential access in America’s most desirable locations. Upper-middle-class families considering homeownership in these markets may need to look beyond traditional financing or consider alternative markets where their earnings translate to meaningful purchasing power.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Where Even Upper Middle Class Homebuyers Face Housing Affordability Crisis
The American dream of homeownership has become increasingly elusive, even for those earning well into the upper middle class income bracket. A comprehensive Zoocasa analysis examining housing affordability across 100 major U.S. cities revealed a sobering reality: while upper-middle-class buyers can afford median-priced homes in 85 cities, there are 15 major markets where even these affluent earners struggle to purchase a typical house.
Understanding the Upper-Middle-Class Income Gap
The middle class spans a broad income range—from roughly two-thirds to twice the median income—creating stark differences in purchasing power. While lower-middle-class earners cannot afford a median-priced home in any major city analyzed, upper-middle-class Americans were expected to have access to homeownership in most markets. The discovery that 15 cities have priced out even these higher earners signals a critical shift in housing accessibility.
Upper-middle-class income thresholds vary significantly by region and household structure, typically ranging from $100,000 to $250,000 annually depending on local median income levels. Yet even these substantial earnings prove insufficient in America’s most expensive real estate markets.
The 15 Cities Where Upper-Middle-Class House Purchases Become Unaffordable
California Markets Dominate the Unaffordable List
California cities occupy a commanding position on this list, with six of the fifteen most unaffordable markets located in the state:
San Jose leads the crisis: With a median home price of $2,020,000 and maximum affordable prices near $1,223,956 for upper-middle-class earners, the gap reaches $796,044—by far the largest affordability shortfall of any city analyzed.
Orange County properties remain out of reach: Both Anaheim and Santa Ana show median prices of $1,450,000, with upper-middle-class buyers able to afford only $762,536 and $771,898 respectively, creating gaps exceeding $680,000. Irvine, also in Orange County, shows a more modest but still significant gap of $300,077.
Bay Area challenges extend beyond Silicon Valley: Oakland and San Francisco both exceed $1.3 million in median pricing. While San Francisco’s upper-middle-class affordability ceiling of $1,138,612 creates a $181,388 gap, Oakland’s shortfall reaches $450,044 despite slightly lower median prices.
Southern California coastal properties command premium prices: Long Beach, San Diego, and Los Angeles all appear on the list, with gaps ranging from $93,407 in Long Beach to $146,523 in Los Angeles. Chula Vista rounds out California’s representation, with the smallest gap among California entries at $16,948.
Non-California Markets Show Varying Severity
Beyond California, five cities spanning different regions demonstrate that housing affordability challenges extend nationwide:
Honolulu ($1,165,100 median, $402,249 gap) reflects Hawaii’s unique geographic constraints and limited housing supply. Newark, New Jersey ($660,000 median, $176,470 gap) shows that even northern metro areas face considerable challenges. New York City demonstrates surprising relative affordability compared to West Coast markets, with a median price of $725,300 and a smaller gap of $37,290—suggesting that even the nation’s financial capital has modestly more accessible entry points for upper-middle-class buyers.
Miami ($643,900 median, $27,246 gap) and Scottsdale ($1,178,000 median, $225,117 gap) round out the non-California entries, each representing regional wealth centers where upper-middle-class earners find themselves priced at the margins of feasibility.
Why These Markets Remain Unaffordable for Upper-Middle-Class Homebuyers
The concentration of California cities reflects broader trends in tech-sector wealth accumulation, foreign investment, and limited housing supply in desirable coastal markets. These factors have driven median prices to levels that fundamentally outpace even substantial upper-middle-class incomes.
The affordability gap represents the difference between what upper-middle-class earners can financially access (typically calculated at 4-5 times annual income) and what properties actually cost. In San Jose, this gap exceeds three-quarters of a million dollars. Even in Miami, where the gap appears smallest at $27,246, upper-middle-class buyers operate with virtually no financial cushion.
Key Takeaway for Upper-Middle-Class Home Seekers
The reality that 15 major American cities have become completely unaffordable even for upper-middle-class house purchases reflects unprecedented strain in housing markets. These findings underscore that income level alone no longer guarantees residential access in America’s most desirable locations. Upper-middle-class families considering homeownership in these markets may need to look beyond traditional financing or consider alternative markets where their earnings translate to meaningful purchasing power.