There's a teacher who really likes shorting. Shorting isn't wrong, but I want to know why you didn't short at the 2370 resistance level. Are you trying to appear contrarian? 🎈

First: 2370 is a resistance level where the previous downtrend started, and it's a position where three one-hour candles couldn't break through. Why didn't you short here? 🎈

Second: You say you can hold positions, but the previous floating profit positions weren't protected with stops for followers—you literally let them go from profitable to stop loss. Is this your trading system? With fixed position sizing, if I lost 260 points earlier, don't I need to make back 260 points just to break even, plus the 300-400 points profit you mentioned? Doesn't that mean I need to short from 2170 down 270+300 to match your trading system? In other words, I'd need to short all the way to 1600 to fit your profit logic? 🎈

Third: This isn't the first time—this is the seventh short position, teacher. Since you're asking followers to pay, shouldn't you be accountable? When losses happen, what do you do? Go silent and disappear. Followers have to deal with it themselves, yet they're supposed to learn from your livestream. I honestly didn't learn where the advantage is in shorting at 2170. I only know you should have shorted at 2370, but you didn't bring followers to short—it's because your capability isn't as strong as the blogger who shorted at 2370.~#ETH