Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
On the War Against Stablecoins: Where Deimos and Armstrong Stand
There is intense debate over how to regulate stablecoins in America, and at the heart of this disagreement are two of the most influential figures in the finance and crypto sectors. On one side, traditional banks, with JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon leading the call for uniform standards, while Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong advocates for a different approach. In a recent interview with CNBC, Dimon clearly outlined the stance of financial institutions.
Dimon Calls for Fair Standards
Dimon believes that issuers of stablecoins that offer yields on investor balances should be subject to the same regulations as traditional banks. He stated, “Rewards are essentially interest. If you’re holding money and paying yields, that means you’re doing banking, and you should be regulated as a bank.” Major financial institutions see this distinction as crucial to protecting financial stability.
Dimon points out that banks are open to negotiating a compromise. Crypto platforms could offer rewards directly linked to their operations and transactions without being subject to all banking regulations. However, any entity accepting deposits and paying interest must be treated as a real bank, adhering to the same rules governing traditional banking operations.
Banks Demand Uniform Rules for Stablecoins
Dimon’s demands focus on fair treatment and comprehensive system protection. All companies providing similar financial services should operate under equal oversight, including capital and liquidity requirements, anti-money laundering compliance, and federal deposit insurance. He said, “A level playing field by product,” emphasizing that unequal standards could lead to risk accumulation outside the regulated system.
This stance sends a clear message: banks bear a heavy compliance burden, including AML checks, community lending obligations, and many other regulations, all of which exist for a reason—to protect the entire financial system, not just ensure fair competition.
The Fight for Fair Competition in Crypto
On the other side, Armstrong believes the solution lies in imposing competition on traditional banks rather than adding restrictions on crypto companies. But Dimon affirms that JPMorgan is not afraid of competition; in fact, the bank is investing in blockchain technologies. The bank has developed digital deposit tokens and processes payments on distributed ledger systems. Dimon said, “We support competition, but it must be fair and balanced.”
This difference in views reflects a deeper struggle over how to build the future digital financial system. Should regulations be relaxed on banks to encourage innovation, or should they be expanded to ensure system safety? This issue has become central in legislative discussions in Washington, especially after Coinbase withdrew its support for the CLARITY Act a few weeks ago.
The Future of Regulation on the Horizon
The clash between Dimon and Armstrong highlights the challenge facing American lawmakers: how to regulate digital assets without pushing activity into less transparent corners of the market. Lawmakers are currently reviewing a new draft from the White House, but the banking and crypto sectors have yet to agree on allowing stablecoin issuers to offer yields on customer deposits. What is clear is that the next chapter in this debate will shape the future of financial innovation for years to come and influence decisions by investors and companies alike.