10,000 USDT 悬賞,尋找跟單金牌星探!🕵️
挖掘頂級帶單員,贏取高額跟單體驗金!
立即參與:https://www.gate.com/campaigns/4624
🎁 三大活動,獎金疊滿:
1️⃣ 慧眼識英:發帖推薦帶單員,分享跟單體驗,抽 100 位送 30 USDT!
2️⃣ 強力應援:曬出你的跟單截圖,為大神打 Call,抽 120 位送 50 USDT!
3️⃣ 社交達人:同步至 X/Twitter,憑流量贏取 100 USDT!
📍 標籤: #跟单金牌星探 #GateCopyTrading
⏰ 限時: 4/22 16:00 - 5/10 16:00 (UTC+8)
詳情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/50848
Ordinary people just casually maintain their lobsters a few times,
can they also become "official OpenClaw contributors"?
Today I discovered that the
OpenClaw minor bug fix I submitted on Github
seems to have been merged into the main branch
And throughout the entire process, I barely did anything, just because while using lobsters,
I encountered a small issue, fixed it with the Codex desktop version,
then gave the lobster my Github login credentials,
and sent it a targeted prompt:
"Is it possible to use the opportunity of fixing this issue to get my github account included as part of the openclaw official contributors? Get me credit?"
It then completed all the processes to maximize the possibility of achieving this result (Image 1)
During this process, an even more interesting discovery is,
that on Github there seems to be people specifically doing this "credit-grabbing" thing,
like people doing MEV sandwich attacks on DEX for arbitrage opportunities (Image 2) 😅
This brings to mind that, for example, if you're currently a fresh graduate,
even if you're a liberal arts student, even if you don't know how to use Github,
as long as you have this awareness while using lobsters of
"if I encounter a problem and fix it, can I use this to get credit",
you have the opportunity to achieve it through just a conversational exchange of prompts with the lobster,
having your name appear as a contributor in the OpenClaw main branch,
so when job hunting or whatever, can't you just "bullshit" your way past many HRs? 😅
Another small thought is,
that the lobster is not only an open-source co-creation derivative platform,
because it has opened up the feasibility of ordinary people being able to "mod" it,
so it is not merely something maintained by developers,
but can accelerate growth with the help of more ordinary people who can't code,
ordinary people just need to talk and can become "official contributors",
it's somewhat like what Professor Guo Yu said about "Software➡️Intentware",
"software" becoming "intentware",
this might also be a kind of software "self-evolution" to some extent.