Vitalik Buterin recently posted a lengthy analysis on X urging the blockchain and cryptography communities to transition to stronger security standards—specifically, 128-bit security. According to him, the current security level of many systems is gradually becoming outdated as global computational power increases faster than ever before.
Bitcoin Reaches 2^96 Hashes: What Does That Mean?
Buterin calculated that Bitcoin’s total accumulated proof-of-work (PoW)—that is, the total computational power expended to mine the current blockchain—has reached approximately 2^96 hashes.
🔍 What is accumulated proof-of-work?
It is a measure of the total work all miners have done since the first block.
It represents the “thickness” of the Bitcoin chain.
To launch a 51% attack, an attacker would need to redo all this work (or more), which is virtually impossible.
When total PoW reaches the 96-bit mark, it means that to brute-force or overwrite the entire history of Bitcoin, an attacker would need to perform computations equivalent to 2^96 SHA-256 hashes—a number so massive it is far beyond the capability of any real-world computer system.
Why Does Buterin Want to Raise the Standard to 128-bit?
Vitalik referenced the argument of Ethereum researcher Justin Drake, who for years has advocated for the industry to use cryptographic systems with at least 128-bit security (requiring hackers to perform 2^128 operations to break the system). For example:
BLS12-381 cryptographic curves
The Lean Ethereum roadmap
Modern signature schemes resistant to quantum attacks
Reasons the 128-bit Milestone is Important:
96-bit is not that far out of reach in the future
Global computational power is continuously increasing, especially as AI, GPU, ASIC, and quantum computing develop further.
2. 128-bit is considered secure for decades
128-bit equals 3.4 × 10^38 possibilities—so large that no foreseeable computational platform can brute-force it.
3. Many legacy crypto systems only reach close to 128-bit
Some old signature algorithms and hash functions may become weak in the face of new technologies.
4. Security standardization helps the entire industry synchronize
Any blockchain could become a weak point if using outdated cryptographic standards, putting the whole ecosystem at risk.
Bitcoin Is Still Safe—But This Is a Warning Signal
Bitcoin uses SHA-256 and PoW, which are extremely strong. However, the network reaching a security level equivalent to 96 bits makes Buterin concerned that we are approaching the threshold that cryptographic systems need to surpass.
Given that:
Hash rate is continually increasing
ASIC hardware is becoming more powerful
Quantum computing is advancing rapidly
New-generation blockchains are using more complex mechanisms
→ If the industry doesn’t transition in time, old cryptographic systems could become significant risk points.
Conclusion: 128-bit Is a Necessary Step to Future-Proof Blockchain
Buterin’s message is very clear:
Bitcoin reaching 2^96 hashes is an important milestone
But it is also a reminder that global computational power is constantly rising
The crypto industry needs to raise security standards to at least 128-bit to ensure long-term safety
Vitalik warns that if the ecosystem doesn’t upgrade, future risks will be much greater than they are now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Vitalik Buterin calls for raising cryptographic security standards to 128-bit
Vitalik Buterin recently posted a lengthy analysis on X urging the blockchain and cryptography communities to transition to stronger security standards—specifically, 128-bit security. According to him, the current security level of many systems is gradually becoming outdated as global computational power increases faster than ever before.
Bitcoin Reaches 2^96 Hashes: What Does That Mean?
Buterin calculated that Bitcoin’s total accumulated proof-of-work (PoW)—that is, the total computational power expended to mine the current blockchain—has reached approximately 2^96 hashes.
🔍 What is accumulated proof-of-work?
When total PoW reaches the 96-bit mark, it means that to brute-force or overwrite the entire history of Bitcoin, an attacker would need to perform computations equivalent to 2^96 SHA-256 hashes—a number so massive it is far beyond the capability of any real-world computer system.
Why Does Buterin Want to Raise the Standard to 128-bit?
Vitalik referenced the argument of Ethereum researcher Justin Drake, who for years has advocated for the industry to use cryptographic systems with at least 128-bit security (requiring hackers to perform 2^128 operations to break the system). For example:
Reasons the 128-bit Milestone is Important:
Global computational power is continuously increasing, especially as AI, GPU, ASIC, and quantum computing develop further. 2. 128-bit is considered secure for decades
128-bit equals 3.4 × 10^38 possibilities—so large that no foreseeable computational platform can brute-force it. 3. Many legacy crypto systems only reach close to 128-bit
Some old signature algorithms and hash functions may become weak in the face of new technologies. 4. Security standardization helps the entire industry synchronize
Any blockchain could become a weak point if using outdated cryptographic standards, putting the whole ecosystem at risk.
Bitcoin Is Still Safe—But This Is a Warning Signal
Bitcoin uses SHA-256 and PoW, which are extremely strong. However, the network reaching a security level equivalent to 96 bits makes Buterin concerned that we are approaching the threshold that cryptographic systems need to surpass.
Given that:
→ If the industry doesn’t transition in time, old cryptographic systems could become significant risk points.
Conclusion: 128-bit Is a Necessary Step to Future-Proof Blockchain
Buterin’s message is very clear:
Vitalik warns that if the ecosystem doesn’t upgrade, future risks will be much greater than they are now.
Thach Sanh