Two actions by the Federal Reserve have led many people to reassess the subsequent market trend.
First, the facts: On December 1, the nearly three-year-long quantitative tightening (QT), which had withdrawn $2.4 trillion from the market, officially ended. Almost simultaneously, the Fed injected $13.5 billion into the banking system through overnight repo operations—this is the second-largest single-day injection since the pandemic.
The signal of a policy shift is clear: switching from draining liquidity to supplying it, the underlying logic of the liquidity environment is changing.
What does this mean for the market? In the past, we were trading on the expectation of a “possible policy shift.” Now, we are trading on the fact that “capital is actually starting to flow back in.” The level of certainty is completely different.
Looking back at historical data, Tom Lee from Fundstrat once calculated that after the last QT ended, the market rose about 17% within three weeks. His recent view is even more direct—improved liquidity will directly push up risk assets like Bitcoin, and he even predicts that we may see new all-time highs by the end of January next year.
Of course, it’s too early to draw conclusions based on a single operation. But at least in the short term, the "water level" is indeed rising—this is a visible change.
There is also significant disagreement right now:
Some believe this is just the beginning, and loose liquidity will continue to drive risk assets higher; Others think it’s merely a technical move—don’t be misled by single data points, a pullback could happen at any time.
What do you think? How far can this round of capital injection go? Or is it just a temporary liquidity fix?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHigh
· 12-06 14:25
After three years of draining, liquidity has finally been replenished. Let's see who still dares to go all in on shorts now.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 12-05 00:07
After three years of draining, it has finally stopped. Now the replenishment has begun—there's definitely something interesting about this logic.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 12-04 07:34
Yeah, never mind, let's just wait and see. It's too early to say anything now.
---
Tom Lee is making big promises again. The historical data looks good but... can it really repeat?
---
Adding liquidity is fine, but what if there's a pullback? Are you all mentally prepared for that?
---
After drawing for three years, it takes just one round of liquidity to take off? Doesn't seem that simple.
---
To be honest, $13.5 billion sounds pretty big, but compared to $2.4 trillion... still feels a bit shaky.
---
Improving liquidity sounds like giving the market a shot of adrenaline. The real question is how long it can last.
---
Don't trust anyone, especially not Tom Lee's high price predictions. Just listen to him for fun.
---
Liquidity is definitely up, but risk assets can turn on a dime. We should stay cautious.
---
I'm watching closely from December to January. If this cycle really takes off, it could get crazy.
---
Instead of guessing how far it can go, better to look at how much room there is for a pullback. You have to think about it the other way around.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 12-03 18:50
Wait a minute, switching from extracting liquidity to injecting liquidity—doesn't that logic seem a bit too straightforward? I can't help but feel like something's off here.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBard
· 12-03 18:48
A top-up is just a top-up, no need to make it so complicated... The historical data is right there, a 17% increase in three weeks is no small number, but the key issue is whether it can be held.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 12-03 18:45
After draining liquidity for three years, now they're injecting it again. This pace is definitely interesting. In the short term, risk assets are sure to rally together—the question is, how long can the party last?
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoad
· 12-03 18:26
They've been draining liquidity for three years and are only now starting to inject it back—it's way too late, isn't it? It's really hard to say how long this rally can last.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 12-03 18:25
After draining for three years, now we have to refill again. This script feels a bit familiar.
Two actions by the Federal Reserve have led many people to reassess the subsequent market trend.
First, the facts: On December 1, the nearly three-year-long quantitative tightening (QT), which had withdrawn $2.4 trillion from the market, officially ended. Almost simultaneously, the Fed injected $13.5 billion into the banking system through overnight repo operations—this is the second-largest single-day injection since the pandemic.
The signal of a policy shift is clear: switching from draining liquidity to supplying it, the underlying logic of the liquidity environment is changing.
What does this mean for the market? In the past, we were trading on the expectation of a “possible policy shift.” Now, we are trading on the fact that “capital is actually starting to flow back in.” The level of certainty is completely different.
Looking back at historical data, Tom Lee from Fundstrat once calculated that after the last QT ended, the market rose about 17% within three weeks. His recent view is even more direct—improved liquidity will directly push up risk assets like Bitcoin, and he even predicts that we may see new all-time highs by the end of January next year.
Of course, it’s too early to draw conclusions based on a single operation. But at least in the short term, the "water level" is indeed rising—this is a visible change.
There is also significant disagreement right now:
Some believe this is just the beginning, and loose liquidity will continue to drive risk assets higher;
Others think it’s merely a technical move—don’t be misled by single data points, a pullback could happen at any time.
What do you think? How far can this round of capital injection go? Or is it just a temporary liquidity fix?