2026-01-15 01:36:32

Some projects seem to be struggling with their core positioning and operational direction. The real question is whether current leadership understands what it takes to scale in this space. If you're building an affiliate or partnership program, you need people who actually get the market—not just names on a roster. Weak execution on partnerships usually points to deeper issues with team composition and strategic thinking. This is the kind of reality check the space needs more of: honest feedback about whether teams have the talent and vision to deliver.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenDustCollector

· 01-18 01:13

Exactly right, many projects just put some well-known people as figureheads, but end up doing nothing... When it comes to partnerships, it's the easiest way to see whether the team is truly capable or just blowing smoke.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 01-17 22:58

Really, a bunch of projects just picked the wrong people and then pretended nothing happened.

View OriginalReply0

GasGoblin

· 01-16 03:59

Honestly, most projects are just looking for the wrong people; even the best direction is useless.

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 01-15 09:49

That's right, a bunch of projects just find some vases to boost the scene... It's really ridiculous how the partnership program turned out, the core issue is still that the team isn't capable.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSkeptic

· 01-15 02:06

That's a bit too straightforward. Projects with no team members really deserve to die.

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 01-15 02:05

Many projects fail because the people are not capable; even the best stories are useless.

View OriginalReply0

POAPlectionist

· 01-15 02:01

Exactly right, a bunch of projects just can't find the right people. They look impressive on the surface, but internally they're a mess. Who's to blame for such poor partnership execution?

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 01-15 02:01

The team's level is really hard to watch, which is why most projects fail.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 01-15 01:58

nah, this is basically just saying leadership is cooked when they don't understand protocol dynamics. weak partnerships = weak signal extraction abilities. most teams hiring for "names" instead of people who actually parse inefficiency vectors... that's how you miss the alpha entirely.

Reply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-15 01:52

That's very true. Many projects just have teams that don't understand the market.

View OriginalReply0